Post GFC Banking Inquiry

Post GFC Banking Inquiry Information

Coalition Online Safety Working Group Survey

Coalition’s Online Safety Working Group

 

John's Diary

 

John's MP3's

Events

April 2012 May 2012 June 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

Contact John Williams

Electorate Office

Telephone: 02 6721 4500

Toll Free: 1300 301 816

Fax: 02 6721 4544

Send Senator John Williams an E-Mail

Facebook FeedBurner Twitter YouTube External Link

Thu

16

Sep

HEAD IN THE SAND ON LIQUIDATORS REPORT

The Nationals Senator for New South Wales John Williams says the reaction by a leading corporate firm to the Senate inquiry report into liquidators and administrators confirms the industry has been in denial for far too long.

Senator Williams, who instigated the Senate inquiry that released its report this week, said he was astonished to read that Managing Partner of Ferrier Hodgson Steve Sherman claimed "a lot of the input into the inquiry has apparently been driven by a disaffected minority group".

Senator Williams said he finds this offensive, particularly to those many individuals who have had their lives torn apart by unscrupulous practitioners who were allowed to go on their merry way while regulators were asleep at the wheel.

"Mr. Sherman said the complaints about one or two individuals created a lot of noise in an industry where there are over 650 registered liquidators. If Mr. Sherman read the submissions and evidence he would realise what damage just one or two can do, but I can assure him there are many more I have received complaints about.

The Insolvency Practitioners Association, which initially said the Senate inquiry was not needed, has now welcomed the initiatives to improve standards in the insolvency profession.

 

I would have thought Ferrier Hodgson would also embrace the 17 recommendations as a way of cleaning up this industry which does not have a good image.

The gravy train may be over", Senator Williams said.

 

Comments 

 
#1 2010-09-17 01:07
A lot of the input to the inquiry was also confidential. I trust FH are more careful with their work for their clients than they are with their media comments.
 
 
#2 2010-09-22 11:53
Speaking from personal experience I can say that FH take care to maximise their own returns and not those of the parties for whm they are appointed.

In particular they take much care in not investigating the conducts of the Financiers involved for whom they also act and are appointed by. In my case they acted in wilful blindness of the conduct of NAB and multiple acts of Fraud
 
 
#3 2010-11-18 14:06
An estimated $34 million was conned from Australians on behalf of Club LaBourse Oceania Pty Ltd [CLBO]. Administrators of CLBO, with sound reasons, recommended Public Examination [PE] of "at least" three named officers. Insufficient funds had been provided for PEs. ASIC concluded that inability to fund the PEs was "a commercial decision". Presumably a lack of funding, which would restrict investigations, was why no recourse was taken to funds of the shareholder of CLBO.
Could neither ITSA nor ASIC have provided funding under the circumstances ?
 
Home News Room Media Releases HEAD IN THE SAND ON LIQUIDATORS REPORT